Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Boca_PETE who wrote (12436)	2/27/2001 12:12:46 PM
From: geode00	Respond to of 42834

Then he successfully identified the top of CTR1 (first estimates for the end of August, and then refined to mid September). I do not understand how he could know in advance of the so far disastrous Oct 2000 CTR2 call that his market internal analysis would not work Excuses, excuses. He DID NOT successfully identify the top of the first CTR because he did not say sell. He doesn't know in advance that his market internals wouldn't work? Actually, he should have, given the failure of the 84 stop. He (and all of us unfortunately) had from summer to fall to see how botched a job the 84 stop was. Instead of looking at the first CTR as a moderate success, maybe it's time to look at it as a lucky break. Here's how it's stacking up since then: October CTR for a 20% pop = down 40% instead. Still no sell. January CTR for a 30% (from the highs to the target) pop = down 29% instead. Still no sell. Still waiting for a nearly 90% pop from the recent lows to hit the original target by June (48==>90). No stop losses, no exit strategies, nothing but dead air and hang ups on the subject. Paying for this?