Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (72328)	2/27/2001 12:19:43 PM
From: John Madarasz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

that's a nice looking chart btw inv h/s still good, res. at 3.35, 200dma and then 4.6... after that nothin but blue sky<gg>

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (72328)	2/27/2001 1:11:27 PM
From: timers	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

heinz... on the basis that inflation is the money supply growing and given the basis that commodities are really the places that money flows to... then the stock mkt has been the commodity that has reflected the inflation and now that that commodity is selling, other commodities should receive that money supply. Those commodities could be traditional commodities or other commodities. What commodities do you see them being and any flaw you see with this argument? Also if it flows to "certain" commodities which are the ones currently used to indictate "inflation", then we would have the perception of drastic inflation when in reality it's been there all along but contained in stocks. In this case the fear factor of inflation being a problem would either a: accelerate the commodity inflation at that time... or b: begin to inflate other "inflationary protection commodites". Which do you see? This is the way i see it. Anything you disagree with here?