Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stribe30 who wrote (29789)	2/27/2001 6:13:27 PM
From: fyodor_	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Scott: analysts saying that Intels numbers are 100% lower then what Intel wanted ;) That would be zero units sold. Not a lot. -fyo

To: stribe30 who wrote (29789)	2/27/2001 11:35:10 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Re: "Paul.. stop answering a question with a question.. (besides, I asked you first) ;) On the one side.. we have unnamed sources and analysts saying that Intels numbers are 100% lower then what Intel wanted and low demand... and we have Mr Barrett claiming great consumer acceptance on the other.. unnamed sources might be speculation.. but I bet Zdnet (often accused of being Intel-slanted) has good sources inside Intel.. Conversely.. we have Barrett making a claim with nothing I've seen to factually back it up.. you accuse the entire thread here of being "droids" and taking AMD says or does as gospel.. surely you arent going to sit here and tell me you believe Barretts word without seeing proof of it... you'd be a hypocrite in my view. You might be antagonistic to AMD and its investors.. but you arent dumb.. or a sheep. I dont think you'd buy into anything without some proof.. so if you have some with regards to Barrett's claims.. . produce it. " And what is the question here?