SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (133695)2/27/2001 6:40:21 PM
From: stribe30  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1570307
 
Scumbria; all is not lost

"US pollution ruling hailed"

Environmentalists in the United States are
celebrating what they say is an historic ruling
by the Supreme Court.

In a unanimous decision, the nine judges ruled
that health benefits should be the sole criteria
in setting air pollution standards.

Road haulage associations, manufacturers and
chambers of commerce had all challenged the
way the Environmental Protection Agency or
EPA set pollution standards.

Lawyers for the industry lobby argued that the
EPA had tightened ozone and soot levels
without clear criteria and without consideration
of the cost, which they put at $50bn a year.

They said the new
stricter controls,
revised in 1997, had to
take into account the
cost of enforcement
and balance that
against health benefits.

Clean air cost

But the Supreme Court
justices rejected that
argument completely.

They said that the
Clean Air Act, one of
America's central environmental protection
laws, specifically barred considerations of cost.

The justices did strike down one of the EPA's
new standards as unreasonable, but
environmental organisations are jubilant that
the EPA has won what one group called a
'tremendously important' case.

news.bbc.co.uk



To: Scumbria who wrote (133695)2/27/2001 10:52:38 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570307
 
Scumbria,

I'm so ashamed. That we elected a moron.

Ditto.

ted



To: Scumbria who wrote (133695)2/28/2001 9:23:42 AM
From: pgerassi  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1570307
 
Dear Scumbria:

You deserve what you got. No vote means you can not complain. You let down all those who gave their life for you to be able to vote. People who have not exercised that right should hang their heads in shame and should not talk or post. You have yet to do so.

Pete


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News