SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (6850)2/27/2001 7:54:15 PM
From: E  Respond to of 82486
 
<<Your c"reativity i"s slip"p"ing.>>

You are using them in the middle of words! Where is the insinuation in that? Or is it a computer code, proving once and for all that you are a fembot? ("He" "spends" a "lot of time" on fembot sites.)



To: Lane3 who wrote (6850)2/27/2001 8:26:06 PM
From: epicure  Respond to of 82486
 
Showoff



To: Lane3 who wrote (6850)2/28/2001 8:34:05 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
The Specter of Global Aging

By Robert J. Samuelson
Wednesday, February 28, 2001

<snip> Some things we can glimpse, and one of them is global aging. It is a specter that stalks most advanced societies. During the next half-century, most wealthy societies -- the United States is a conspicuous exception -- will lose population; all will have older populations. This is a collective change that will profoundly influence the world economy, the future of democracy and relations between nations with declining populations (generally richer countries) and those with expanding populations (generally poorer countries).<snip>

<snip>As Hewitt notes, richer countries could also prepare for their aging by investing in poorer countries. Trade could substitute for immigration. Investments from wealthier countries would enable developing nations to build up their industries. As people retire in the rich world, they could use some of the dividends and interest from their investments to buy imports from poorer countries. Both developed and developing countries would benefit. But this bargain assumes, Hewitt says, that "globalization" works smoothly -- an iffy assumption. <snip>

washingtonpost.com