SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (2179)2/27/2001 10:20:09 PM
From: KMT  Respond to of 74559
 
This would cover two of those headlines, i.e. Russia increasing arms exports and war in the Middle East.

hallindseyoracle.com

To all who contribute here, this thread is very enjoyable.

KMT



To: TobagoJack who wrote (2179)2/27/2001 11:47:00 PM
From: SouthFloridaGuy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
and my favorite:

"Backstreet Boys retire due to lack of interest"

...Maybe we can get some good music again as the feelgood times finally end.

You are too funny, Jay, I am sending your post to some buddies - great job.



To: TobagoJack who wrote (2179)2/28/2001 12:03:57 AM
From: hobo  Respond to of 74559
 
Fat luck for those headlines...

There is too much excess still... (maybe even an ipo in the future)

avclub.theonion.com

Now... for the real headlines... take a look:

theonion.com



To: TobagoJack who wrote (2179)2/28/2001 12:35:21 AM
From: Bridge Player  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
You folks can all stop posting to me now, I found out what I wanted to know.

Have fun.



To: TobagoJack who wrote (2179)2/28/2001 4:42:58 AM
From: Bruce Brown  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
“Threat Of War In The Middle East”

LOL!

It's been in the daily headlines for over 2000 years...

BB



To: TobagoJack who wrote (2179)3/22/2001 12:40:53 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 74559
 
While this is not GE, it will do as a placeholder for now for the news headline tracker -

siliconinvestor.com

P&G Seen Setting 10-20 Percent Staff Cut

Mar 21 7:27pm ET

By Brad Dorfman

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Consumer products giant Procter & Gamble Co. , struggling with sluggish sales growth and rising costs, is widely expected to announce cuts of 10-20 percent of its workforce on Thursday, sources familiar with the situation said.

The Cincinnati-based maker of Tide laundry detergent and Crest toothpaste is expected to inform employees of the cuts on Thursday morning before a conference call with financial analysts, the sources said.

A P&G spokesman declined to comment on job cut speculation. But the company did say that it was having a conference call with analysts on an unspecified subject.

The job cuts at the Cincinnati, Ohio-based maker of Tide laundry detergent and Crest toothpaste could be as deep as 20 percent, but would more likely be 10-15 percent of the company's 110,000-employee workforce, the sources said.

Executives at P&G, worried about their own jobs, have been contacting corporate recruiters in anticipation of large-scale job cuts in recent days.

James Mead, a former P&G executive and now president of executive-search firm James Mead & Co., said he has received "a significant amount of phone calls from P&G (executives) as they are planning a future downsizing."

A.G. Lafley, who became P&G's chief executive last year after a series of earnings warnings, told financial analysts in September of 2000 there would be an increased focus on cutting costs at the 164-year-old giant that sells products in more than 140 countries.

The company has set up an internal task force to examine costs, led by senior executive Steve Donovan, spokesman Tom Millikin said.

"We are examining every cost area of the company," Millikin said. He declined, however, to comment specifically on job cuts, citing company policy against commenting on rumors and speculation.

In 1999, the company said it would cut 15,000 jobs, mostly through attrition, as part of an overhaul to focus the workforce globally, rather than regionally. The company has cut 7,200 of those jobs, Millikin said.

But marketing, research and administrative costs actually rose to about $12.48 billion in fiscal 2000, which ended last June, from $10.85 billion a year earlier, indicating there is definitely room for more cost cutting, said Simon Burton, senior consumer staples analyst at Banc of America Capital Management, a P&G shareholder.

"That's a big chunk of change," he said.

P&G has struggled with sluggish sales growth and external factors that have hampered earnings. Sales rose a little over 4 percent in fiscal 2000 and actually fell 4 percent in the first six months of fiscal 2001.

Last month, the company said that it expected earnings in the second half of fiscal 2001 would be lower than previously expected due to the financial crisis in Turkey, its 12th-largest market.

P&G shares on Wednesday fell $2.70 to close at $63.20, a drop of 4.1 percent, in New York Stock Exchange trade. The shares were trading above $76 before the earnings warning. The stock had been as high as $118.375 in January of 2000 before falling to as low as $53.25 six months later.

Executives from P&G would be entering a tight job market, as the slowing U.S. economy has prompted massive layoffs at many companies, while many e-commerce firms that have hired P&G workers in the past have gone bust.

Technology companies Compaq Computer Corp. 3Com Corp. , and food maker H.J. Heinz Co. are among companies that have announced job cuts recently.

At the same time, consolidation in the consumer packaged goods industry has eliminated some jobs that might be a natural fit for former P&G executives.

"I think it will be somewhat difficult," Dick Satterfield, a former P&G executive who is now manager of Cincinnati recruiting firm Satterfield & Associates. "The market has absorbed quite a few consumer goods package executives in the past few months."

Still, P&G executives are sought after by other companies, John Challenger, chief executive of outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, said.

"They come out with a pedigree, coming out of Procter & Gamble, that's like going to Harvard," he said.



To: TobagoJack who wrote (2179)6/24/2001 9:13:55 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 74559
 
Hi Jay, getting close to another very bullish headline ... <<“Japan to Save Economy By Increasing Defense Spending”>>

nni.nikkei.co.jp

QUOTE
Issued: June 25, 2001
Industry targets U.S. missile defense
Government approval or not, private concerns keen on active R&D

SOTARO SUZUKI
Staff writer



Enlargement

The Japanese defense industry is showing great interest in the U.S. missile-defense program. The two governments are working together on research into Ballistic-Missile Defense systems designed to intercept incoming short- and medium-range missiles.

While some political issues remain unresolved, such as the legality of Japan's participation in collective defense, the program could become a project worth more than 1 trillion yen ($8 billion) if the defense system was ever deployed.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd., a major contractor in U.S.-Japan joint missile-defense research, is keeping a close eye on the progress of program talks. Asked about the new U.S. missile-defense strategy, Mitsubishi's managing director, Tadayuki Tanioka, said there had been no change in their plans to date.

The system deals with four items in particular, all of them based on rocket technologies: an infrared seeker, which identifies and tracks the target; a nose cone, which protects the seeker from aerodynamic heat; a kinetic warhead to destroy the enemy missile; and the rocket motor.

The U.S. government asked Japan and other nations to join its Strategic Defense Initiative, a predecessor of the current plan, in 1985. Mitsubishi sent a study group to the U.S. the following year and proposed that the Japanese government undertake "research on Japan's missile defense."

SDI became an international issue out of fears it would encourage military build-up, and the Japanese government opted not to take part in the project.

Mitsubishi, however, formed a joint research group with Raytheon Co. and McDonnell Douglas Corp. (now part of Boeing Co.), both U.S. firms, and was granted a contract by the U.S. government to develop a missile-defense system to cover not only Japan but the entire western Pacific region.

Mitsubishi has enthusiastically pursued missile defense out of a "sense of mission that research is essential to Japan's defense," according to a source at Mitsubishi.

Japan's latest defense systems rely heavily on licensed U.S. technology. If a missile defense system is ever deployed in Japan, the nation must again rely on U.S. technical expertise. Mitsubishi believes cooperation with the U.S. on defense-system development is essential for Japan, and will give Japanese companies an advantage in dealing with U.S. licensed technologies, according to Mitsubishi sources.

Costs of the 1 trillion yen missile plan will be incurred in many areas, from development to mass production and deployment of the missiles. Because no major increase is expected in the Japanese defense budget, there are no large projects for Japanese companies other than domestic development of transport and patrol aircraft. Despite a bleak business outlook, defense contractors hope to develop advanced technologies for missile interception.

Washington, in a break from an earlier plan, now appears to want a system that would intercept missiles from a location closer to enemy territory. Since it is much more difficult to intercept long-range missiles from the U.S. mainland due to increased speed of the missiles, the U.S. is looking into a system that could target missiles as soon as they are launched.

"The joint Japan-U.S. research does not envision a system aimed at attacking a missile shortly after its launch," according to one defense expert. Details on the latest U.S. position have yet to be revealed, but if the U.S. and Japan decide to expand the scope of their joint research, Japanese companies might be called on to take a more active role.

If the missile-defense program is ever to graduate from the research stage to development and deployment, Tokyo must deal with tough issues such as whether Japan should engage in collective defense. The defense industry must wait for the government to make its decisions on these matters, but that will not stop contractors from making preparations for the possible introduction of a missile defense system.
UNQUOTE



To: TobagoJack who wrote (2179)7/31/2002 9:31:05 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hi Jay, <<February 27th, 2001 ... some upcoming news headlines. The order and specific company names are not important. Say 18-24 months ... “GM Shuts SUV Lines”>> ... this is close enough for government work, for now, for starters:

nytimes.com

July 31, 2002
Ford Excursion Near the End, Sources Say
By MICHELINE MAYNARD

ETROIT, July 30 — The Ford Motor Company has decided not to build a second generation of the Excursion sport utility vehicle, which is seven feet tall and able to seat a softball team, people close to Ford's future product program said tonight.

The Excursion, cited by critics as the industry's most visible symbol of sport utility vehicle excess, is expected to be discontinued at the conclusion of the 2004 model year, meaning that it will have lasted only one generation. The Excursion was introduced in 1999 as a 2000 model year vehicle.

Sarah Tatchio, a spokeswoman for Ford, declined to confirm whether the company would drop the 19-foot vehicle, which gets 10 miles a gallon, is too long to fit in many garages and takes up two conventional city parking spaces.

"I am not able to talk about the future like that," Ms. Tatchio said. "The Excursion is part of our lineup for '03 and that's all I can say." Reports of the end of the Excursion appeared tonight on WDIV-TV in Detroit. Several industry analysts have also been projecting the Excursion's eventual demise.

Ford introduced the $45,000 Excursion in a bid to grab sales away from the industry's perennial leader in the extra-large sport utility vehicle market, the Chevrolet Suburban. At the time it was conceived, Detroit automakers were enjoying strong sales and healthy profits for sport utility vehicles.

"Detroit went completely cockeyed when it came to trucks," said Christopher Cedergren, managing director with Nextrend, a consulting firm based in Thousand Oaks, Calif. "They thought that if it was a truck, it would sell and make a load of money."

Ford's expectations were relatively modest, however. Given that Suburban sales topped 100,000 a year, it hoped it could sell at least 50,000 Excursions annually. It thought the vehicle, based on the Super Duty Ford F-series pickup, could round out a lineup of vehicles including the Ford Explorer and the Ford Expedition, which seemed petite by comparison.

But the Excursion stumbled from the start, in part because of a wave of negative publicity fanned by environmental groups like the Sierra Club. Even before the Excursion was officially introduced, the group ran a contest on its Web site to choose a nickname for the vehicle. The winner was the Ford Valdez, after the Exxon tanker that ran aground in Alaska.

Tonight, Carl Pope, the executive director of the Sierra Club, hailed the Excursion's pending demise. "I think this is a sign that the age of dinosaurs is about to come to an end," he said.

The Excursion's introduction came less than a year after William Clay Ford Jr., an avowed environmentalist and great-grandson of the company's founder, became chairman in 1998. Mr. Ford found himself in the awkward spot of having to justify the vehicle, which the Sierra Club contended would emit 130 tons of carbon dioxide over its lifetime, compared with 23 for a conventional car.

However, Mr. Ford, who became chief executive last year, defended the Excursion, contending it had received a "bum rap." He pointed to the $15,000 in potential profits that Ford hoped each vehicle would yield, even while acknowledging that Ford was too dependent on truck sales.

But instead of the hoped-for results, industry analysts said Ford most likely lost money on the Excursion. It needed to sell about 40,000 a year to break even. In the first half of this year, Ford sold 15,107 Excursions, down 16 percent from the pace in 2001, meaning it is likely to sell only about 30,000 this year.

Mr. Pope said, "William Clay Ford will go down as the man who was smart enough to kill the Excursion before it became an Edsel" referring to the embarrassingly unpopular Ford car of the late 1950's.

In fact, the Excursion's lack of market success is the key reason why Ford is discontinuing the Excursion, not criticism from environmentalists, said Michael Luckey, president of the Luckey Consulting Group in Pompton Plains, N.J.

While Ford recently ended a streak of losses by posting a modest second-quarter profit, it has warned investors to expect a loss for the third quarter and has embarked on a vigorous cost-cutting campaign. Ford recently announced it was dropping the Lincoln Blackwood luxury pickup truck, which it sold for less than nine months.

"They are looking at everything with a fine-tooth comb," Mr. Luckey said. "If Ford was earning $4 billion to $5 billion a year, it might survive to the next generation."

Mr. Luckey said the Excursion's eventual disappearance did not mean Americans had completely tired of sport utility vehicles, only that they had more choices. A number of vehicles have three rows of seats, one of Excursion's key selling points, but are easier to maneuver, he said.

"S.U.V.'s are going to be very popular, but as far as bigger is better, this could be a sign that people have said enough is enough," Mr. Luckey said.



To: TobagoJack who wrote (2179)10/31/2002 9:24:57 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hi Jay, <<“GE Capital Owes Up On Hidden Losses”
“The House That Jack Left”>>

Message 18178349

Take your seat, for the show is about to start:0)

Chugs, Jay



To: TobagoJack who wrote (2179)11/22/2002 8:43:41 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hi Jay, <<February 27th, 2001 - ... Do not know about economics, but here are some upcoming news headlines ... “Gold Is Back” “Precious Metal Reappears On Business Week Where To Invest Your Money Issue” >>

and here we are ... or at least, in any case, getting closer ...

businessweek.com

SAM STOVALL'S SECTOR WATCH • From S&P
By Sam Stovall

Why Gold Bugs Are Swarming Again
A series of positive developments raises rich possibilities for gains in the precious metal -- and for investors
Investors are rediscovering gold. And gold-mining stocks' recent strong performance has landed the group back on the list of industries with top Standard & Poor's Relative Strength rankings. Year-to-date through Nov. 15, the S&P Gold subindex rose 9.1%, vs. a 20.1% decline for the S&P Super 1,500 (the combined S&P 500, S&P MidCap 400, and S&P SmallCap 600).

S&P analyst Leo Larkin maintains a positive investment outlook for gold stocks. He notes that a sharp decline in interest rates since January, 2001, has made short-selling of the metal by producers and market speculators less profitable. Short-selling has been a major negative for gold prices in the past several years.

Larkin has several other reasons for his positive outlook. He says equity markets are less likely to offer as much competition for investment demand. Double-digit rates of return for equities from 1995 through 1999 lured investor dollars away from gold and provided immense competition for the yellow metal.

SHINING THROUGH. Larkin also cites rising commodity prices, reflecting consolidation in commodity-producing industries and a recovery in global economic growth. Through November 11, 2002, the Bridge Commodity Research Bureau (CRB) Commodity Price Index was up 19.1% after a 16.3% drop in 2001. A rebound in the global economy and large increases in the U.S. money supply should lift commodity prices in 2003, according to Larkin. And that means inflation will still be a factor for investors to contend with -- playing to gold's traditional role as a hedge against rising prices for goods and services.

As for supplies of the metal itself, Larkin notes that the deficit between gold production and consumption will widen as output declines and demand increases. The low gold prices of the past several years have led to sharply reduced exploration for new mines, and will result in lower production even if the metal's price rises dramatically.

Also, the agreement by central banks to limit gold sales through September, 2004, to 2,000 tons, including sales by the Bank of Switzerland and the Bank of England (BOE), removes an uncertainty that plagued the market during the late 1990s. Central-bank sales in preparation for the launch of the European common currency, Australia's sale of part of its reserves in 1997, and the BOE's sales announcement on May 7, 1999, all helped depress market prices.

CHOICE NUGGETS. And finally, Larkin points out that the gold-mining industry is undergoing major consolidation. In 2001, Barrick Gold acquired Homestake Mining, and Newmont Mining acquired Australia's Normandy Mining in February, 2002. Mergers will result in larger market capitalizations and more trading liquidity in the stocks. This will make the group more attractive to institutional investors.

Larkin's current favorites in the group? He has a 4-STAR (accumulate) ranking on both Barrick Gold (ABX ) and Newmont Mining (NEM ). Larkin thinks both companies, with their low-cost mines, are well-positioned to capitalize on further price gains for the metal. He also likes Barrick's "rock-solid" balance sheet and rising free cash flow, and Newmont's aggressive debt-reduction efforts.

S&P Relative Strength Rankings
These industries carry 12-month relative strength rankings of "5" as of November 15, 2002 -- meaning that they're in the top 10% of the 114 industries in the S&P Super 1,500 (the combined S&P 500, S&P MidCap 400, and S&P SmallCap 600) based on prior 12-month price performance.

Industry/Sector Largest Company (Market Cap.) S&P STARS* Rank
Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods/Consumer Discretionary Quiksilver (ZQK) 5 STARS
Brewers/Consumer Staples Anheuser-Busch (BUD) 4 STARS
Consumer Electronics/Consumer Discretionary Harman International (HAR) Not Ranked
Distillers & Vintners/Consumer Discretionary Constellation Brands (STZ) Not Ranked
Gold/Materials Newmont Mining (NEM) 4 STARS
Homebuilding/Consumer Discretionary KB Home (KBH) 5 STARS
Housewares & Specialties/Consumer Discretionary Fortune Brands (FO) 4 STARS
Managed Health Care/Health Care UnitedHealth (UNH) 5 STARS
Metal & Glass Containers/Materials Pactiv (PTV) 5 STARS
Photographic Products/Consumer Discretionary Eastman Kodak (EK) 1 STAR
Trucking/Industrials Yellow Corp. (YELL) 5 STARS


*S&P's ranking system for the appreciation potential of stocks over a 6- to 12-month period: 5 STARS (buy), 4 STARS (accumulate), 3 STARS (hold), 2 STARS (avoid), 1 STAR (sell).



To: TobagoJack who wrote (2179)9/28/2005 8:30:57 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
delete



To: TobagoJack who wrote (2179)7/15/2008 3:02:37 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
I was never seduced by that "margarine is healthier than butter" idea. From my oil industry days when oxidation, polymerisation, PAHs etc were the evil-doers for health, I decided food grade low melting point liquid oils, lipids and fats like butter, olive oil, eggs etc were not only no problem to eat but are actually GOOD to eat. I always gobbled eggs during the decades when they were considered a health hazard.

I always had low cholesterol and blood pressure.

Natural foods which taste good, taste good because they are good. Artificial foods which taste good are usually lethal because chemists use their knowledge to seduce our taste buds and body chemistry to gobble the stuff although it's nutrient free and toxin laden.

Things which taste bad, usually are bad. Plants have waged chemical warfare, to the death, for umpty million years, against mammals, insects and other predators, and we have evolved taste receptors to participate in that fight to the death.

Plants are vicious. They use any biological process they can to attack us. If we need to breed, they fill us with estrogen to cut fertility. If we need nerve function in our brains, they produce hallucinogens so that predators find us an easy meal while in a confused state. They produce carcinogens. They do all sorts.

Which, ironically, is good from a cancer treatment point of view as the destructive chemicals tend to work preferentially against cancer cells which are less robust than normal cells with defenses intact.

Some conspire with humans and other primates to defeat other plants and to propagate. Bananas for example have tiny little seeds surrounded by delicious food. So we eat them and poop the seeds out kilometres away to produce the next lot of bananas. Some have a three way conspiracy using bees, flowers and fruit, plus humans to really take over. Chinese gooseberries, aka kiwifruit for example. They also do physical strangulation and smothering of enemy plants to really get on top.

It's war out there.

Mqurice



To: TobagoJack who wrote (2179)10/1/2008 11:22:40 PM
From: Maurice Winn2 Recommendations  Respond to of 74559
 
Yes TJ, that's an excellent list. <hello maurice, reminding you of wisdom> I notice that I never wrote to disagree with it. But your timing was out by 6 years. <The order and specific company names are not important. Say 18-24 months. If we do not believe that at least 25% of the headlines will come to pass within the next 18-24 months (time determined by recklessness of Maestro), we should start to accumulate stocks now, looking pass the valley of gloom. >

My favourite [in a separate list] was "GE shows hairy legs". Warren Buffett decided said hairy legs were attractive, being robust and capable of strong performance. He has been waiting for half a decade for the financial weapons of mass destruction to explode and they are doing so and he has jumped in while the 1812 Overture plays and the cannons roar.

Dissolute wastrel lives can go on for quite a while, but eventually the piper must be paid and the chickens come home to roost.

Your list is quite comprehensively prescient [which was hardly of Oracle of Delphi proportions since such events are predictable]. Nevertheless, I remain in the Dow 16,000 camp, albeit 6 years late so far, with more to go. Quite a lot more if Japan's 18 year experience is a guide, which it won't be.

Vitamin C has been shown to reduce chemotherapy effectiveness by protecting cancer cells. I haven't seen a brain damage claim yet. Cellphone radiation is not going to amount to anything. At the very worst it will turn out to be a vanishingly small effect and trivial compared with the benefits.

Recommendation = buy QCOM [since it has dropped 25% since the recent post-Nokia settlement peak while profits continue to boom]. Maybe they lost their $11 billion cash on some weird financial investment with the wrong institutions. But even so, the drop is too much.

Did you see I made many $millions on shorting and covering SKF? I sold my $120 million tranche and am now cashed up wondering what to do next. I saw around 6 corners and won on each corner. Zim the Amazing would be amazed. C2 was impressed.

Mqurice



To: TobagoJack who wrote (2179)10/22/2008 11:24:05 PM
From: Maurice Winn4 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
TJ, you are certainly getting a LOT of opportunity to load up on gold, platinum, silver and oil at bargain prices.

You have the luck of the devil.

But I am doing well too - I can load up on QCOM for only $35 instead of $53 a few weeks ago.

Mqurice



To: TobagoJack who wrote (2179)2/27/2009 3:36:15 PM
From: Maurice Winn2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
An excellent and prescient list. GE is indeed showing hairy legs: finance.yahoo.com

The Dow is still far from 16,000 and it is much later than Feb 2002 with the Dow at less than half that.

Financial relativity theory laws don't stop working though. We are having a deflationary trough but soon enough, the Zimbabwe effect of "stimulus spending" on borrowed or printed money will become evident. The Dow will soon enough reach 16,000 as the measuring stick continues to shrink. One measure of the shrinkage is gold at $1000 an ounce.

Eastern Europe, Germany, UK and co seem to be in a spot of bother. Germany has lots of unemployed. Perhaps they could be given uniforms and taught how to march = a traditional activity in Europe when young males are in surplus. Islamic Jihad would be well-advised to keep a low profile as times get harder and the liberal nampy pamby do-gooder tolerant attiudes get hardened up.

A couple of decades ago, watching a bunch of tough young male Germans in Frankfurt, I thought they looked as though they were only two goose-steps away from something more appealing [to them] than their pointless activities of the time.

But Gert Wilders, who made "Fitna",http://www.fitnamovie.net/ is persona non grata in England, so there is still a Neville Chamberlain streak there in the face of grave threat. Notice that Islamic Jihad is not so active in Germany. It would not take long to reopen concentration camps.

Partly the presence of Islamic Jihad in Britain is demographics, because Britain opened the doors to Pakistan Moslems back in the Enoch Powell era. It seems odd to invite in people sworn to your defeat and conversion, but that's what they did. Maybe the British thought Moslem religion is a hobby for Sunday like Christianity had become. It turns out that Moslems actually take the words of the Koran as being believable and containing good ideas. So when it says to hack off the heads of infidels, they are not just speaking rhetorically.

When the Pakistani doctors who tried to blow up LPG containers compared their Hippocratic Oath and their Koranic Oaths, they obviously decided cooking people alive at an airport was the better oath to follow. They were obviously idiots - they had no idea about how LPG tanks work and how LPG burns etc which calls into question their fitness for medical activities. They had perhaps seen too many movies showing cars laden with a bit of fuel making spectacular explosions and thought they were real.

Mqurice