Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Group Therapy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Graphs who wrote (3183)	2/28/2001 4:16:35 PM
From: E. Graphs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4564

Edit last post: there was a bill introduced on Monday suggesting ways to decrease our dependence on foreign oil and make it easier for America to meet its own energy needs by cutting some restrictions to opening up federal lands, including a small part of Alaska, for drilling. I expect there will be more of this kind of thing coming from the new administration.

To: E. Graphs who wrote (3183)	3/5/2001 9:02:55 AM
From: Duane L. Olson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4564

E! "Gee, I've become such a basic needs girl lately! " And Kramer just said on CNBC that techs might be "nothing" for the next two years. Meanwhile, the nas is looking towards possible upside today. Most of what is not in cash in my accounts is in value stocks, so I can't be the naysayer, but it occurs to me that the entire future that we saw last year just can't be dead. The kids are going to play with Playstation !V or X, or XBox, the people who long have really, REALLY wanted DSL will stil want it, the usage of internet isn't going down soon.... Where do we reach to point where where we are overdoing the downdside on the techs? (Not yet, I'm sure) tso