SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (29893)2/28/2001 6:50:31 PM
From: Win SmithRespond to of 275872
 
Itanic locked Inattic for IDF theregister.co.uk

So for the second successive Developer Forum, Intel will keep baby
Itanic locked out of sight in the attic. That baby Itanic is slow,
overweight and prone to high temperatures is not to be unexpected
in an infant. But so "hideously ugly" is Itanic, according to recent
benchmarks, that visiting press will have to make do with hearing
screams and crying from upstairs.

Recent figures posted by CERN labs' Fons Rademakers, a Linux
cluster guru, show a two-way 733Mhz IA-64 running a technical data
analysis benchmark at a quarter of the speed of an
equivalently-clocked two-way Xeon. Figures confirmed by testers
we've spoken to confirm this. Performance sucks.

"The good thing is that the programs runs correctly," concludes
Rademarkers. "However, as it stands now it looks like Merced will
be a major dud." . . .

Perhaps, taking a leaf from the British royal family, Chipzilla can
confine its handicapped offspring upstairs for good - and pretend it
never was born? ®



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (29893)2/28/2001 10:21:06 PM
From: Joe NYCRespond to of 275872
 
Tenchusatsu,

I'll bet AMD's server products for 2001 doesn't contribute anything significant to AMD's own bottom line, either. But hey, they will have excellent price/performance!

AMD server chipset (like the the entire Itanium family) already add to the bottom line - a negative number in both cases.

Joe