Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: average joe who wrote (6962)	2/28/2001 6:53:17 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Hey Rabbit, welcome back. I've got a rumbling in my tummy so I'll check back later to see how things went.

To: average joe who wrote (6962)	2/28/2001 8:07:34 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Hmmm. A sort of admission. Almost a retraction, one might say!!! I'm honored to have received what I believe is the first of those from you, though I haven't been the first to suffer your "argument" by insinuation. And this quote from you is interesting! -- "Your problem is you ignore content and madly attack words." You know where the content here on SI resides? I'll give you a hint... it starts with a "w." Now.... do you admit that you have no reason whatever, no evidence, no source, no justification for associating Poet with "off shore trading"? And for responding, when she asked for your reasons, asked you for any evidence at all for your insinuation, asked you for CONTENT, responding with the insulting and irrelevant further insinuation that it wasn't "illegal," so she shouldn't "sweat it"? Just wondering.