SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mr. Whist who wrote (5561)3/1/2001 9:27:35 AM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 59480
 
Liberal hate groups spike alternative voices at NPR:

All Thing's Considered... You're Fired

A National Public Radio affiliate in Little Rock has dumped the editorial page editor of The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, conservative Paul Greenberg, as a commentator after his comments angered prominent local contributors.

Greenberg reports that he was asked by KUAR to do a weekly commentary to balance the pundit. But after only two outings, he was told his services were no longer required, though his liberal counterpart was being retained.

Greenberg, a Pulitzer Prize winner who coined the nickname "Slick Willie" for Bill Clinton, said the station manager, Ben Fry, told him it was because contributors to the station had objected.
foxnews.com



To: Mr. Whist who wrote (5561)3/1/2001 12:42:31 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Respond to of 59480
 
who wants me banned from this thread
You've been behaving somewhat better lately. We'll give you a stay of execution for now.

Did you know that Clarence Thomas tapes Rush Limbo's radio program
So? You don't think the liberal justices have their favorite commentators too? In one or two cases, it's probably Karl Marx.
What leads you to believe the First Amendment does not also apply to Supreme Court justices? Implied by "free press" and "free speech" are "free reading" and "free listening", and I see nothing in the Constitution that exempts justices from these rights.

when I use the term Prez-Select,
Oh, but he did legitimately WIN THE ELECTION. He is actually more legitimate than his predecessor Slick. Remember, Slick in '92 got only 43% of the vote; Bush did much better than that. In addition to legitimately carrying the electoral college which is what actually determines who wins. Whether you like it or not.

lazy lazy neer-do-wells ... wastrels ... who are living off their inheritance
How about the lazy lazy neer-do-wells and wastrels who are living off welfare? You don't think there are bums in the lower classes too? And the Prez isn't giving them $40 grand each; he is taking less of THEIR MONEY in taxes. Work on that distinction: THEIR MONEY. It really is important; neither I nor my money belong to the government. Any time the government thinks otherwise it had best roll the tanks because there is going to be a problem.

Fairy tales?
Yeah. Fairy tales. Because your fairy tale ignores the FACT that most millionaires in this country EARNED THEIR MONEY (there's those words again) IN THEIR OWN LIFETIMES and are NOT "lazy neer-do-wells ... wastrels ... who are living off their inheritance."

Drive a stake into my heart!
How about your head instead, and we'll put some facts on the tip?