Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SLSUSMA who wrote (1178)	3/1/2001 2:21:43 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12465

SLSUSMA, note the line in the WSJ article that says: The online-trading firm, whose stock plunged 75% last year from its March high, asserts that anonymous posters used pseudonyms to "mislead the public into believing that" Mr. Cotsakos "posted the messages" -- all in a bid to drive down E*Trade's stock. Checking Yahoo insider trades we see that Cotsakos, from March 2000 on, realized paper gains totaling more than $16 million. Add in other companies and the total swells to more than $20 million. For example: 2-Aug-00 - Paper gain of $254,407 at a fair market value of $13.94/share on 2-Aug-00. 7-Jul-00 - Paper gain of $578,835 at a fair market value of $15.81/share on 7-Jul-00. 24-May-00 - Paper gain of $254,407 at a fair market value of $13.94/share on 24-May-00. 24-May-00 - Paper gain of $391,297 at a fair market value of $13.94/share on 24-May-00. 24-May-00 - Paper gain of $2,149,749 at a fair market value of $13.94/share on 24-May-00. 24-May-00 - Paper gain of $13,010,787 at a fair market value of $13.94/share on 24-May-00. biz.yahoo.com I don't know the particulars of the suit, but seems to me it would have been quite easy for someone with the stature of Mr. Cotsakos to have called Yahoo and said he wasn't posting and wanted the account of the person using his name to be deleted. If Yahoo, who can do whatever they please on their own message boards, deemed that the imposter might actually be mistaken for the real person, then I see no problem with them removing the account. Had the account been opened in the name of, say, "Cotsakos_Sucks", then I'd say Yahoo should just leave it be since there would be no confusion (to a reasonable person) the account holder was not actually Cotsakos. As I recall, the actual law on these things is based on "confusion in the marketplace" or something similar. Had the suit gone to trial, it would have been interesting to see if someone posting "obvious" parodies on a chat board under the name of a real person might be protected as, say, a celebrity impersonator would be on Letterman or Leno. - Jeff