Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Home on the range where the buffalo roam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mishedlo who wrote (11041)	3/1/2001 7:02:01 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13572

<As for those projections on Q, They are liars.> I have heard that Jacobs is very reliable and upfront as opposed to some other CEO's in techland. I believe him myself. DAK

To: mishedlo who wrote (11041)	3/1/2001 7:06:25 PM
From: Sam Sara	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13572

nytimes.com I went back to financials today, opened puts on BAC. Went out to Aug., to give me time to be wrong short term. I have been waiting for financials to look weak. They are there now. Will add if I am right about timing.

To: mishedlo who wrote (11041)	3/1/2001 7:34:09 PM
From: DaYooper	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13572

Don't worry about pissing me off Mike. I have a great appreciation for your lighting up the dark side for us permabulls. Thanks if I haven't mentioned it before. I'm here to make and protect money -- not to be massaged. As for those projections on Q, They are liars. I'm still willing to bet that case of Heiniken on this quarter's .29 being met or beat. You might want to review a summary of yesterday's analyst's meeting first though.<g> Of course Q's management might have been lying LOL. You've got a tremendous grasp of the market as a whole Mike but less so on QCOM. Rory