To: veliny who wrote (6846 ) 3/2/2001 12:41:49 PM From: Cal Gary Respond to of 14101 Hi V I had to re-read my comments. Sorry to misinform. The accum/dist figures is not an indicator on institutional buying. My point is TA is the art of measuring accumulation and distribution which happens every day in DMX. So long as there are more accum than distribution then, of course, I am a buyer and hopefully reflected in the share price shortly thereafter. Upon early detection that distribution is more than accum, then I sell or short, in general. There are times when FA positives are so overwhelming, like in DMX's case, despite short term indications that its a sell, I just hold and try to switch funds around to buy more. When its way too obvious that short term down is going to happen, I sell some and buy even more shares back. But there's just not enough volume to execute this strategy with great consistancy. For example , looking at daily trades, house buying /selling, the indicators on weekly, daily, and hourly charts offer different degrees of TA accum/distribution. So depending if you are a day trader, trader, swing trader, position trader, or LT you would use your own method that works best for the time frame and what it is you want to accomplish. So to measure which institution is buying or selling is another form of TA. Using house positions is merely a good guess that a fund is buying or selling, like TD dumping in dec. The only real way to collect institutional ownership is to get a hold of the shareholder's list or do a comprehensive search of every fund's portfolio and add up all occurance of DMX. So its a matter of trade off, do you got time to drill down vs. just get a good snap shot from an indicator on the chart? OF course there is a lot of guess work and pattern fitting in TA, but it is necessary to set up a frame work to hang your trade decision upon.