Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Palau who wrote (130005)	3/2/2001 10:23:12 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

The difficulty is that you are asking for reactions to things which were never so controversial, and which are a decade old. I would not venture to comment, because I do not have adequate details before me. You may as well ask me where I was on the night of October 11, 1988. I dunno.....

To: Mr. Palau who wrote (130005)	3/2/2001 10:28:19 AM
From: Bill	Respond to of 769667

Every pardon can be criticized at one level or another. By definition, all the people being pardoned are criminals. The Rich pardon is particularly distasteful, so much so that even democrats are upset by it. However, because I find despicable acts by Clinton to be the norm, a Rich pardon on the "merits" would signify nothing more than Clinton's usual softness on crime. But because I have a brain, I KNOW the Rich pardon was a quid pro quo, whether it be for money, sex or both. It was indeed a crime and the statute of limitations has not run out. I just wish congress had the balls to do something about it.