Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonkie who wrote (1187)	3/2/2001 12:38:21 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12465

Zonkie, good question. I presume the SEC was also thinking about the shareholders, many of them elderly who were solicited via cold calls, in keeping the stock trading... although that might be difficult given, last I checked, Sylver himself was the transfer agent. Perhaps they were also thinking about the shorts who now might like to cover (gg). I would think given the now public SEC allegations of fraud that insiders would think twice about dumping, but no one has ever accused Sylver of being able to think once. ;^) - Jeff