To: Chip McVickar who wrote (1417 ) 3/3/2001 4:31:48 PM From: Joan Osland Graffius Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12411 Chip, I see we have to educate you on farming. Organic farming is not here to stay with most of the farm land in this country. You are looking at the "very" small farmers that grow veggies, some fruits and a small amount of animals for the organic market in their backyard. Most of these farmers are very small and can make a living if they have retirement checks. <g> It is a cottage industry because it is massively labor intensive. At least this is the way it is in Minnesota. These organic farmers hand control insects, weeds, and generally have a few animals to collect the manure and cure it for fertilizer. If you live in Boston, take a trip to an Amish farm and you will get a feeling of what is involved to be an organic farmer. Lets talk about the majority of the farm land in this country. We farm a few 1000 acres in the Red River Valley in North Dakota. This land produces hard and soft wheat, oats, beans, some corn, potatoes, sunflower seeds and has a thriving sugar beat industry. These farmers would not think of going back to organic farming because they would not be able to pay for the fuel to generate the crops. The crops would be at least 90% less in product production. They need pest and weed control; and fertilizer for sufficient production to make a living. Also, the land cost is not a factor in the equation because the great grandfathers, grandfathers and fathers paid for the majority of the land. These young people will purchase a few acres to add to the acreage like their forefathers. You can not find enough human beings on the earth to go into the fields and kill the insects that eat the crops and pick the weeds that starve the crops from moisture. Further more these human being would tramp down the crop. I do not know where you would find the natural fertilizer to make the crops grow. There just is not sufficient amounts of the right kind of animal refuse or the time to cure it, in the world to provide the amount and type of fertilizer required. I have not talked about the economics of capital equipment named John Deere <g>, but tractors over $100,000 and combines over $150,000 gives you a little idea of the costs involved. Also as one poster noted the kind of equipment a farmer has purchased is critical for what they can produce. The equipment for corn is very different than equipment for wheat…now if you want to grow both you need two pieces of harvest equipment at over $150,000 a piece. Also these two crops require different type of equipment for planting. The story goes on and on and on. The farms before weed control, insect control, and fertilizer were small self sufficient entities. They had very little requirements for cash to purchase goods for survival. They build their own building with help from neighbors, grew and manufactured 99% of their own food, constructed their own clothing, etc, etc, etc. Joan