Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (128883)	3/2/2001 7:11:20 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Paul, A cool post of yours from two years ago: To:Scumbria who wrote (49159) From: Paul Engel Wednesday, Feb 10, 1999 2:16 AM View Replies (2) \| Respond to of 133966 Slickster Slippery - Re: " As I stated earlier, the only way to accurately measure average latencies is in a real system with very sophisticated instrumentation. Since I do not have a DRDRAM system available, this would be impossible." FOR MONTHS you have been babbling on and on about Direct RDRAM latency and bandwidth issues and as you NOW ADMIT - YOU DON'T KNOW JACK SH*T ABOUT THE ISSUE . What a bluffer bag of gas you turned out to be ! Paul Message 7750083

To: Paul Engel who wrote (128883)	3/2/2001 7:26:43 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Paul, Another cool post of yours from two years ago: Scumby - Re: " Merced is going nowhere real fast. The chip is huge and will not be manufacturable in quantity. The performance will probably be a great disappointment as well. " You know ALL about the K7's performance and ALL about the MERCED performance - and neither of these have been released. Why don't you quit embarrassing yourself and destroying whatever credibility you have left - and stop posting your opinions which have no facts to support them ? Paul Message 7569832