Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : McData (MCDT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (187)	3/2/2001 10:03:32 PM
From: Douglas Nordgren	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 234

I'm gonna have some more fun with you, you moron. Your self aggrandizing persona and cheap shit shorts reveal you for the real piker. Your hot shot record comes from running with shitty horses in the County Fair circuit, and your butt-licking following is made up of dummies who can't come up with their own losers. In this market they could have done better on their own throwing darts. Case in point - your cheap-shit short on McData. That took a lot of brains to figger out. I suppose you're the one responsible for all 7 million shares short? A herd is a herd is a herd. In the meantime, some hedge fund managers I keep regularly informed (for a fee you can't afford to pay) made killings flipping the SNAX (huh, whazzat?). Where were you? Out of the loop and touting sad-sack shit to your sycophants. What a penny-ante piker. I make money in the stock market, up and down, and from the stock market players. Maybe if you were an adult, real people might actually want to let you in on some real action. They made real million$ and you piked out on McData. Whatta genious. Your problem is that you think everybody is stoopid like you and anybody who isn't you has to be losing money. You need to get a grip on reality. I suppose the irony that Goldfinger was a megalomaniac and a cartoon character is lost on you. And didn't I just tell you to zip up your pants? You're em-bare-assing yourself. PS Dumb shit, I invite you to jump on my stocks. Everyone else already has, just where the hell have you been? PPS You are not the deadliest short around here, you just haven't met some of my friends, and you never will cuz you'll always be an ignorant little shit.

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (187)	3/3/2001 11:52:09 PM
From: Gus	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 234

There you go again trying to change the topic because you can't finish what you start. Don't you get tired of always shooting your wad into your own cavernous mouth too early? You screamed irrationally that fundamentals don't matter because it's all about supply and demand then when I prove to you that you're behaving in the same eeire fashion as the rising tide genuises that you despise -- now how's that for a public and pathetic display of self-hatred? LOL -- you try to drop hints that you know how to read discounted cash flows and historical valuations in a desperate attempt to prop up your crumbling persona. You're apparently too stupid to realize that you just contradicted yourself again and proved my point. LOL. When you read the financial statements of any tech stock in a vacuum with a disdain for supply line analysis, you're effectively reading them upside down in the dark while you're trying to lick your behind just because you think no one is looking. You probably like like the taste, you blabbering idiot! LOL. No wonder you're so bitter. The reason many real world longs and shorts scrutinize the supply lines is that signs of order book adjustments show up there first before it hits the financial statements, which contain a record of the past and are therefore lagging records. The reason many real world longs and shorts constantly scrutinize the business models revealed in the financial statements of technology companies is to develop and constantly refine a fine-grained sense of proportion of how major order book adjustments will ultimately make its way through the different supply lines in different parts of the world. If you don't even understand this basic point and you are screaming about how fundamentals don't matter and that it's all about supply and demand then you're the type of idiot drawn to rigid and mechanical investing systems that try to predict what are essentially rolls of the dice. The fact of the matter is that is an investing strategy like that is doomed to fail. The reason that many real world longs and shorts are beginning to use the cyclical valuation model (early stage to late stage) as the basis for their accumulation and selling strategies regarding tech stocks, is that different target markets (corporate, consumer) are beginning to buy different types of technology according to an increasingly modular schedule depending on the economic cycle. But all that is way above the pinhead of a hysterical drama queen like you parroting old wives talk about financial armageddon that doesn't match today's velocity of information and capital. Furthermore, you're too stupid to even realize that people can actually watch your pea-sized brain work in super slow motion and see through your empty boasts to find the total bankruptcy of your character. Face it, chump. The reason you will always be a trader toy and keep on giving back whatever nickels and dimes you make off hot stock tips time and time again is that you have bad genes, poor breeding, a terminal case of acne and extemely weak fundamentals. And what is this 'we' thing, dammnit? Since when did all your multiple personalites dispense with the shape of the table debate and conduct a secret ballot appointing a spineless and hapless lowlife like you to be their official spokesman? Grow up!