SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: YlangYlangBreeze who wrote (7194)3/2/2001 10:37:48 PM
From: coug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Hi YYB,

I hope all is well. A question please.. I have thought about for a long time, with no answer.. Re: Souls.

Since the soul is thought to be eternal.. Is there an infinite number souls to enter our "space". Will souls multiply with "us".. When someone leaves "us", is the soul still there?. And come back?? As "us" or different living types.? ..

I do not know..

Thank you for your thoughts..

coug



To: YlangYlangBreeze who wrote (7194)3/2/2001 10:51:51 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 82486
 
Joelle, I am not looking to net some number of babies and I agree that if pregnancy was unwanted I agree that the 3 prevented fertilizaions is a good thing. But not the 3 cases where there was fertilization but no implantation. The 2 women facing a further choice or in other words the two women who get pregnant anyway are not directly relevant to this question as they would face the same choice with or without MAP. I might agree that avoiding implantation is better then a latter abortion but it is not certain that they would all result in a later abortion.

I would say that 3 people dieing peacefully in their sleep is better then 3 people being torn apart by wild dogs. But I wouldn't cause or let three innocent people get killed without pain in order to avoid the worse death for two people.

AS for the 50% figure its something that I pulled off the top of my head with nothing to back it up. It could be very off, but for purposes of this discussion it will serve if no one has any more accurate figure. It really doesn't change the issue at hand if it is 25%, 50% or 75%.

Tim