Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (130110)	3/2/2001 8:37:24 PM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Nadine, I have answered your question twice. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough. Since social security is a part of the overal budget (as set up by Democratic politicians years ago), we should pay for the costs of any imbalances out of the general fund until it is solvent financially. Can you answer me this one question? If you're against partially privatizing social security. How do you intend to pay for the huge elderly population coming our way. As I've said before, one solution should be balanced against doing nothing. A train is heading our way, and we don't have the option of jumping off the track. That's typically what happens when government sets up a socialistic system. Everything looks ok for the first thirty years or so. Then economic realities catch up to those (believed) brilliant economic planners.