Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (128911)	3/3/2001 12:22:30 AM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Paul, It would be kind of dumb for someone on a salary to try to finance a tax cut which is 50% for individuals above $900K annual income. Don't ya think? Scumbria

To: Paul Engel who wrote (128911)	3/3/2001 12:37:43 PM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 186894

Paul, <<<I will assume that you and the Clinton Grifters will refuse such tax cuts and pay the old rates.>>> I believe there is a legitamate philosophic difference. I agree with Bush that we should have less government and to return money to taxpayers - which belong to them in the first place. But, why do we also have to subscribe to giving money back to the top 1%. First of all they don't need it. For most of them a healthier economy is much more important. Second, giving money back to the top 1% does not help the economy whatsoever. Instead, why not just halve the 46% (of $1.3T) in tax cuts for the top 1 % and use that to pay off the debt and go along with the rest of the proposed tax cuts? Just a suggestion. Mary