SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cheeky Kid who wrote (67798)3/5/2001 12:39:03 AM
From: LPS5  Respond to of 122087
 
I was talking about shorting has no purpose for the public company. If I owned XYZ Computers Inc, what would shorting do for my company?

Well, if XYZ Computers Inc. was publicly traded, and you were the CEO - or, even if you were just an investor - you'd want an orderly and continuous market for the stock. Without short sellers, you wouldn't have that.

And that says nothing for hedging. If you owned stock and wanted to hedge it against a decline, other than a terrible mismatch by using sector futures or options, the best opportunities you have hedging are found in shorting the stock or buying puts.

LPS5



To: Cheeky Kid who wrote (67798)3/5/2001 2:54:59 AM
From: RockyBalboa  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
Evidently it serves no purpose to discuss this matter with you any longer. That's the sad part of it. Same religion as some people adhered to when they always (sic) tried to "call in the certs..."