SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: hmaly who wrote (134081)3/5/2001 5:58:10 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580053
 
Harry,

I didn't say that at all. I said that the example you use, isn't an example of insider trading at all. To be considered a violation of insider trading rules a trade must have " deception in connection with the purchase or sale of any security" -- a required element of violations in Section 10(b) It is not illegal for a officer of any company to trade his shares, and whether he reports the sale or not doesn't necessarily make it a deceptive trade.

What you were reading were excerpts from the article, the link to which I had posted previously to Tench. You might want to read the full section on GWB in the article before making your call. The link to the article is below.

ted

motherjones.com



To: hmaly who wrote (134081)3/5/2001 6:19:15 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580053
 
Harry,

It is quite illegal to trade based on non-public information, except under very controlled circumstances. Bush should be in jail.

Don't kid yourself.

Scumbria