SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (7539)3/5/2001 8:08:24 PM
From: cosmicforce  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
You said you were anthropocentric. I was trying to figure out what you meant when you said it. I know what I mean when I say it about someone (dictionary definition #1): someone who thinks that the most important thing in the world and the universe is humanity. That is a pretty inane belief, IMO, totally unsupported by any data other than a biological ego that is out of proportion with the accomplishments, but a lot of people have it.

People aren't squat if there aren't plants to feed them, minerals to mine, air to breath, oceans to evaporate, animals to render and whatnot. Why people would resist including these elements into their sphere is beyond me. It's like talking about plants but not acknowledging the roots, soil, commensal organisms and whatnot that are part of the plant and its ecology.



To: TimF who wrote (7539)3/6/2001 12:12:59 AM
From: cosmicforce  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
What I do think is that humans are more somewhat distinct from and more important then any other species of life on the earth.

I went back and reviewed this dialog. This seems to be the core of your's and Neo's value system. Why do you believe this?