SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rick who wrote (40032)3/6/2001 2:11:23 AM
From: Uncle Frank  Respond to of 54805
 
Humorous but serious article on QCOM from the moderated thread:

Message 15452809

Every year, Qualcomm sends out its HDR Gestapo to the GSM World Congress in Cannes to rant and rave about the wonders of code division multiple access in all of its evolutions. Sure, Qualcomm has some apparently legitimate reasons for being there. They have a booth. They give demos of their new technologies. They schmooze with the delegates. But those aren’t the real reasons Qualcomm attends each year. No, they come to spoil the party.



To: Rick who wrote (40032)3/6/2001 11:29:45 AM
From: Rick  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
The changes this week:

g. Historical Perspective = towneley.com

(Ö¿Ö)



To: Rick who wrote (40032)3/13/2001 5:54:51 PM
From: StockHawk  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 54805
 
First this:

>>From: Fred Manzo

JDSU and Nortel now value stocks:

NY Post

nypost.com;

and now this:

From: Fred Manzo

THE CASE FOR DOW 12,500
Monday,March 5,2001
By BETH PISKORA

nypostonline.com;

Now Fred, you know I've always valued your posts and the great work you do around here, but today I must really congratulate you. I have seem many disarming, forthright admissions on this thread, people stepping forward and confessing how they made poor decisions or bad trades, or engaged in wrongheaded options and margin situations, etc. Some have been bracing, some enlightening, all have taken courage to write. But for you, on a public forum, to openly admit more than once that your read the New York Post, well that is really something.

StockHawk@doestheNationalEnquirerhaveanonlineversion