Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Lundin Oil (LOILY, LOILB Sweden) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tommaso who wrote (2143)	3/7/2001 10:41:10 AM
From: hubbabuba2	Respond to of 2742

There are a number of reasons for my reverse proposal. A number of firms Including ML won't trade (EVEN when the customer demands it) in sub $3 stock. You can guess all the reasons (and the reasons for not are??), not the least of which is an indication of management of sincere effort to turn the company and it's perception around. Not many really credible co's trade for this low. What's the gain versus the cost in it? {Other than making market makers happy perhaps.) A series of concrete steps are necessary to restoring credibility. Project execution of course is key - but I'd take a comprehensive approach as a measure of sincerity.

To: Tommaso who wrote (2143)	3/7/2001 12:19:34 PM
From: excardog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2742

LOILY question Does anybody have a speculation on exit rate production for 2001? Will any new fields be on line by December? I'm thinking about doing a "Richard Rainwater big bet" with this stock in my IRA. Sorry I haven't been following this board much but I intend to start. Alan don't expect Dan to do much work on this the DD is pretty tough. Why else would I be asking stupid questions. Luck to all Scott ps: Big gas day for me thanks RD.