SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KevinMark who wrote (35833)3/7/2001 12:12:05 PM
From: AD  Respond to of 49816
 
It's such b.s. Kevin. Calling this a pretty good time to add new positions is easy, safe. Downside risk is there, but shouldn't be more than 15-20% imo.

If she were ever to be hailed a true hero, she'd have had to yell SELL SELL SELL!! a year ago.

But of course, she'd have lost her job.

Some one wake Dale up.
He's slacking.

AD



To: KevinMark who wrote (35833)3/7/2001 12:12:50 PM
From: Jazz102  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 49816
 
Abby Putting New Spin on Same Old Bullish Story
By James J. Cramer

3/7/01 11:26 AM ET

Nothing "rigorous" to Abby Joseph Cohen's call. No brainstorms. No logic that I haven't heard before.

However, Abby, a terrific spinmeister, used this call to do something extraordinary: pitch herself as someone who was antitech at the top and is now pro-tech because it is the bottom. And what makes her so sure it is the bottom? High cash levels in mutual funds.

This is an extraordinary accomplishment for this gifted strategist. She has taken credit for getting you out of the Nazz at the top and now wants credit for getting you in at the bottom.

If I were an equity strategist at another firm I would be furious that the Goldman Sachs analyst is trying to take credit for sidestepping the whole morass, given that her firm's research department didn't get negative on the worst part of tech until the bottom. It seems so two-faced, so extraordinarily non-rigorous.

But part of being a great strategist is acting out the role of great strategist. You can position yourself any way you want. There is no independent investigating organization that will look into her claims. There is no analyst court of inquiry among peers that says "Abby we forbid you to take credit for calling the Nazz top," or "We demand that you tell us, give us a real reason why this is the bottom in tech, given that your tech team last week told us to get out."

Instead there is just guys like me, saying, "Hey, nice positioning."

What a game!



To: KevinMark who wrote (35833)3/7/2001 12:16:02 PM
From: SirRealist  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 49816
 
She may be Betty Fred or Billie Arnold Bob;
She's humpin' for the drek stocks
So Goldie Sachs can rob
more money from the poor
to give unto the rich.
Only John's earned that name, Joseph,
Abby Cohen's a mere...

carny.