Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : KOB.TO - East Lost Hills & GSJB joint venture -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John M who wrote (14636)	3/7/2001 7:10:51 PM
From: LostHillsGuy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15703

Hi John, How did they do time wise getting the #1 facility together? Did they exceed your expectations or was it about as expected. Everything seems to be working well at the site. If there is any problem is seems to be on the receiving end. To the lay person your discussion with GH's of #2 is interesting. The main difference that is see between the two wells is depth. A little less friction loss might make for a few more mcfd or is it not enough to matter. Looking forward to the next few days, LHG PS Coil tubing truck still hooked up to the well.

To: John M who wrote (14636)	3/8/2001 1:18:20 AM
From: dad	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 15703

Hello John M {Don't get me wrong..I love to talk about the science. I was getting a little concerned that others on the board were tired of hearing about it. Well they will have to live through one more round.} I for one, invite you and grayhairs to discuss the science involved (or anything else, you care to discuss) as we truly enjoy learning as much as we can. I may not understand everything, but I'm certainly eager, to try. Thanks, draderd.aka..dad

To: John M who wrote (14636)	3/8/2001 12:37:20 PM
From: grayhairs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15703

Hi John. <<I love to talk about the science. I was getting a little concerned that others on the board were tired of hearing about it.>> This has always been a very good board and some who don't comprehend the science, and its implications, may in fact prefer to exchange conspiracy theories, discuss what THEY see as incompetent management, and of course to criticize insiders for repeatedly flipping 1000 share lots for nickles. Don't YOU tire of those discussions ??? BTW, the IGNORE feature works well and is available to all. Anyway, I do appreciate your coming back for "another round". So, if we assume that the sandface AOF of BKP#2 will indeed be very high (let's just say ~200 MM/d), and that the dry gas wellhead deliverability will be ~40 MM/d with the planned completion\tubulars, then the real issue of course becomes the associated water production. So, what water cut do you foresee at BKP#2 during the upcoming production test ?? Have a good one. Later, grayhairs