SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Fred Levine who wrote (43335)3/8/2001 12:18:13 PM
From: michael97123  Respond to of 70976
 
Fred,
Relax, A marxist idea isnt necessarily a bad one and wasnt meant to insult. I was talking about rates, not estate tax. . If 39.6% is good for you great. How is 44%? Bipartisan rate reduction ended many deductions and fixed highest rate at 28% in 1986. All Bush is talking about is 33% or half way back. How is 35%? Can you live with that? I dont get it. Mike



To: Fred Levine who wrote (43335)3/8/2001 12:53:54 PM
From: Dale Knipschield  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
>Remember, Gates Sr., Buffett, Soros, etc. all think it is wrong to give welfare to the wealthy.<

I a heartily agree, but not taking as much of their earnings in taxes should NOT be confused with giving them welfare.

Who says the conservative - liberal ideologies can never be reconciled? I have a simple, fair solution: It begins with a declaration of your political ideology..........liberal or conservative. Upon declaration, you would be automatically enrolled in one of two tax systems, one for liberals, one for conservatives. Liberals would have a minimum-max rate of 50 - 90%. Conservative rates would be from 15 - 30%. It would be close to net neutral, and everyone would be happy. Liberals would assuage their guilt feelings, conservatives could feel good about not perpetuating a quasi-socialist
ideology.

Let me know if you need anymore problems solved, I'll be glad to help :^)

Regards,

Knip