Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marginmike who wrote (77141)	3/8/2001 11:18:47 AM
From: pater tenebrarum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

we'll see..anyway, they ALWAYS trot out those two in concert.

To: marginmike who wrote (77141)	3/8/2001 12:14:05 PM
From: JRI	Respond to of 436258

MM- Re: Naz....Yes, volume light on downside...but equally light on upside.....last 3 days, all the UP was a function of gaps up...not intra-day.....where is the conviction from the houses? If they are lightly-treading into this, can it really go higher? Given we're in a bear market....does it make sense to expect 2600 without a catalyst? Outside of upcoming Fed meeting (think we are still too far away), having a hard time seeing the catalyst....if I recall correctly, we had some pretty low-volume selloffs in Oct-Dec...and everytime, folks starting looking for a bottom...