Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zoltan! who wrote (130818)	3/8/2001 10:45:43 PM
From: Mr. Palau	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

>>Looks like Bush's pardons are all defensible<< Zoltan, I have read enough of your posts to realize that even with the dark tint of your partisan lenses, you are too intelligent to actually believe that statement: On what basis do you believe that GB Sr.'s pardon of the Pakastani heroin dealer was defensible, if so, on what ground? You believe that the pardon of Armand Hammer had nothing to with the fact that a few months earlier Hammer had contributed $100,000 to the Bush-Quayle campaign and another $100,000 to the Republican Party? washingtonpost.com You believe that the Cox pardon had nothing to do with the fact that his father had donated $200,000 to Bush and the GOP, and $100,000 to the Bush Library Fund? cnn.com You believe that his pardon of an international terrorist was defensible, if so, on what ground? nytimes.com onlinejournal.com And you believe that his pardon of Weinberger -- who had not yet faced trial -- had nothing to do with the fact that GW Sr.'s involvement was about to become an issue in the upcoming trial? C'mon, Zoltan, send me a pm admitting that each of these pardons was questionable, and I will never again darken the doorway of this thread again.