SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Lloyd who wrote (77655)3/9/2001 6:47:52 AM
From: Earlie  Respond to of 436258
 
Don:

Too bad the author or his quoted contact (that "head equity trader") didn't bother to review a bit of the tech sector's historical data. If they had done so, they would have found that tech stocks like INTC traded for many years at multiples many times lower than today's,....... and in times that were characterized by growth, not saturated markets.

You have to love it when they are forced to dig so deeply into the dirt to find a supposed reason for the sheep to buy. (g)

While the funds that are humping huge loads of tech stocks can be counted upon to throw more good money after bad to try to support their holdings, it is just a matter of time before the press of ugly news brings on the panic stage. It has always been thus.

My local chapter of the Darth Vader Society has hoisted its banner........."Lock and load, short and hold". (g)

Best, Earlie



To: Don Lloyd who wrote (77655)3/9/2001 9:24:39 AM
From: Mike M2  Respond to of 436258
 
Don, pure BS Fred Hickey notes in his March issue of The High Tech Strategist " in 1990 Intel sold at two times sales with sales growing at 30%. In 1995 Intel sold at 3 times sales with sales growing at 40%. At $37 /sh in 2001 intel trades a eight times sales even though Intel's sales are no longer growing. " Mike ho ho ho