To: JakeStraw who wrote (12434 ) 3/9/2001 10:37:26 AM From: Crystal ball Respond to Well, I was comparing why I was selling EMC to Buy NTAP, and then vice versa, as has been my "arbitrage-like" trading strategy between the two, depending on which is most oversold (NTAP currently) or most overbought (was EMC, but it is coming down fast) and then reversing when they cross each other on price performance. So thas how this NTAP talk was pulled in here, and also the discussion of the rule of IDIOCRACY aka ANALysts, who are so hindsighted, at least by 18 months that I think there should be more SEC and NYSE/NASDAQ regulation on them and their brokerage houses. Some sort of FD on ANALysts, for example they can not ANALyse at all unless their brokerage house hold a minimum sized position, and then like insiders they can't sell, until so many days after they release their own downgrades, this would keep them more honest, as they would not be 18 months on downgrades that are so long over with, they only add confusion to an upswing once a stock has bottowmed, which I feel is their brokerage houses attempt to push a stock down, yes manipulate it, to help out short selling clients caught in a short squeeze, or to push it a little cheaper to buy it up extra cheap just as it recover from a bottom, all to help their PRIME customers and clients or even the brokerage house. This is what I feel is a vast short selling conspiracy, and needs a full disclosure reg like Regulation FD for these ANALysts.
