Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonkie who wrote (131024)	3/9/2001 3:48:39 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

The person below "am and engineer." You would think someone who is constantly bragging about himself would at least have a rudimentary knowledge of basic english grammar usage. Don't believe me though, click on a few of his tirades for a good laugh. I think by your example you meant spelling, which is distinct from grammar. It's strange but I have the same habit of typing and when I'm thinking an.

To: zonkie who wrote (131024)	3/9/2001 5:10:01 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

dear dear dear zonkie, I did not think you had it in you. but that's such a nice listing of all my posts that I mailed it to myself to file. As to the fact that I am and engineer it's a boolean construction that is a test. Those who who get it "and" those that don't. The scoring of the test is binary and those who get it are a 1 and those who don't are a ZERO. Such a nice post puts the stokes in the fire of my chew chew. So the OFFICIAL Silicon Investor WaCkY MarKEtZoiD En-Gin_EaR EXTRODINAIRUS is smiling. tom watson I said it already.

To: zonkie who wrote (131024)	3/10/2001 1:36:44 AM
From: cAPSLOCK	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Personal attacks are quite unimpressive. There are many different people who post here, and each style is distinct. There are even people on either side of the 'debate' (that is supposed to be going on here) who do not use grammar and spelling as well as they could. I would propose that often people on chat boards type quickly... and in a kind of - non edited stream of conciousness style - that can be difficult for others to read, but is their style none the less. I am sure that if we went back over posts by you and me we could fine many errors. cAPS