Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Home on the range where the buffalo roam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Boplicity who wrote (11403)	3/9/2001 6:58:38 PM
From: Sam Sara	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13572

<1000 is ridiculous. Why not 500? geez> So was 5000 to 2000. There are many lies that were foisted on the public, coming to be revealed. I am willing to bet that there are a few more revelations to come. Any non-trader should be acting on the assumption that Naz will hit 1500. If I am wrong, and this is the bottom, so what, does anyone seriously think that we will rocket up from here and never look back? I think we could rally at any time on the Naz technically. That is part of reason why I am not shorting tech. Problem is this unrelenting stream of bad news. Fundamentals always override technicals, if they are strong enough. That said, we should bounce at Naz 1850-1950. Nothing goes straight down. What makes me really uneasy is broad market. If that tanks next week, psychology could be so strong that mutual funds may not be able to hold that level. I consider it a low probability event, but would not discount it. More likely, we bounce soon, and then guessing game starts as to retrace level.