Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bobby beara who wrote (71606)	3/9/2001 9:23:27 PM
From: Chuck Williams	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99985

where's your bottom, bb? can't be next to Nicole's. It's long gone; she ran out of money.

To: bobby beara who wrote (71606)	3/9/2001 10:15:36 PM
From: KymarFye	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 99985

So are you saying you thought the trading had a somewhat negative tone today, Bobby? Was interesting that the Nasdaq Comp seemed to find support at, or anyway ran along the top of, the precise trend-line you could draw from the end of Jan (end of the little congestion band that you called a double evening star) through today's session. It cuts right through the bottom of those ludicrous fakeout gaps up that have been the only "relief" in this latest crash. What could be me a more pathetic excuse for a "rally" than that Ciena-day gravestone, or that truly pathetic series of ultra-low-volume snowbound dojis we put in Friday to Wednesday? I'd post an LG-wannabe chart illustrating it all, but my feelings are still so hurt by the general non-response to my previous set of charts that I wouldn't do it unless you said pretty-pretty please. And I don't expect that. The persistence of support on that descending trendline and remnant support from the ever more frequently observed l-t Nas log chart might lend some credence to George Cole's scenario - which seems like one decent scenario among others. I'm thinking more and more these days that the 90's bull market trendline SHOULD be ruptured, definitively, perhaps amidst some fraidy-cat peek below 2000 (maybe Monday?), and a short-strangling reversal (Monday or Tuesday?) into a vaguely rational rate-easing countertrend rally that soon peters out into a wound-licking trading range. If that's what pans out, then long-time holders won't get a big kick out of, say, riding SUNW from 17 to 20 next week, or 11 to 15 if things don't develop so quickly, or 20 to 30 sometime later, or WHATEVER, but those are mighty fine gains if you've got the cash and the stomach and the timing for them.

To: bobby beara who wrote (71606)	3/10/2001 3:46:33 AM
From: jmootx	Respond to of 99985

Bobby Berra Hey I'm up to the challenge. You are a good market analyzer and I want you to know that I respect you analysis. But we are challenging each other on competely different meytrics. I am out of tech, I want it to play for dead. in my carreer, like yours there have been time tech has been a non-event in leading the market. That is all I am saying. My picks, ANF, HSE, and WM are all non tech plays. go ahead and scalp all the tech you want wishing for COMPX 1500-1800. But in my opinion you ain't goint to see it before May.