SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Uncle Frank who wrote (40173)3/10/2001 2:25:24 AM
From: Mike Buckley  Respond to of 54805
 
Great comments, Frank. I'd like to add that the author's comparison of the Nifty Fifty with Gorillas doesn't make any sense to me. The Nifty Fifty didn't have anywhere near the sustainable competitive advanatage that Gorillas have. One reason it took a decade for them to recover is because it happened to be a decade riddled with inflation. That decade was a terrible period for the broad market, not just the Nifty Fifty. And if the author believes that the companies in the Nifty Fifty had as much impact on advancing the world's economy as Gorillas have, I'll simply have to disagree with him as much about that as I disagree with him about the publication date of the manual. :)

--Mike Buckley



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (40173)3/10/2001 10:40:30 AM
From: hueyone  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 54805
 
Mariner--- some of his comments regarding valuation might be worthy of reconsideration in the context of gorilla gaming in the future.

Uncle Frank---We've been trying, mariner, but so far we've only been able to identify peaks and bottoms in the rear view mirror, which isn't very useful. I'm still waiting for someone to propose a metric that will pass scrutiny.

Uncle Frank, I have noticed that when we get into this discussion, your statements often seem to tie investors' concern for valuations to the general failure of market timing. For example, you follow up Mariner's statement that it might be worthwhile for the thread to take a more serious look at the valuation problem with the statement that we can only identify peaks and bottoms in the rear view mirror. But do these two statements really have anything to do with each other?

Warren Buffet is is the most successful investor over the last forty years that I am aware of. Some items he has in common with Gorilla gaming are buy quality companies with a sustainable, competitive advantage, long term buy and hold, and don't try to time the market. But he has at least one more extremely important investment criteria that Gorilla gaming and this thread fail to give its due---and that is to buy companies at a discount to their intrinsic value, to buy companies when their stock prices have a margin of safety. Does this last criteria make him a market timer? Hardly. Buffet will buy a stock at a discount to intrinsic value fully realizing that the stock could go much lower in the short term, but he doesn't care, because he knows in the long run the stock will come back to its intrinsic value.

I am not advocating the thread change its nature to become a numbers centered, valuation discussion group, because I think the thread already has its hands full trying to identify technology companies with sustainable, competitive advantages. Accomplishing the above goal is a huge undertaking in itself and I am very greatful to have found a discussion group that takes on this objective. In addition, I believe it would be very difficult for thread members to agree on a intrinsic value for our companies. Yet I find the tendency to dismiss people's valuation concerns with the statements that 1. gorillas are almost always undervalued and 2. that concern for valuation is somehow related to the general failure of market timing to be extremely misleading and disconcerting statements. I just wish the thread leadership, rather than tending to dismiss valuation concerns, would acknowledge the extreme risk in buying a gorilla at any time at any price without regard to valuation. (JMHO)

Best, Huey