SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (78401)3/10/2001 3:38:51 PM
From: Roads End  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
That guy was an arrogant butthead on the way up. No surprise here, ACWBD.



To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (78401)3/10/2001 3:40:23 PM
From: marginmike  Respond to of 436258
 
That shooting the homeless idea, now thats progressive thinking.....-g-



To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (78401)3/10/2001 4:08:31 PM
From: Lee Lichterman III  Respond to of 436258
 
ROTFLMAO, A lot of that going around. I haven't received my reply yet but did try and point out some reason to another. <g>

Message 15480594

Good Luck,

Lee



To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (78401)3/10/2001 4:08:33 PM
From: UnBelievable  Respond to of 436258
 
The Hardest Thing To Tell People Is The Obvious Truth



To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (78401)3/10/2001 4:44:20 PM
From: GraceZ  Respond to of 436258
 
Message 15476940

"Godwin's Law" prov. [Usenet]

"As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one." There is a tradition in many groups that, once this occurs, that thread is over, and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument was in progress. Godwin's Law thus practically guarantees the existence of an upper bound on thread length in those groups. However there is also a widely- recognized codicil that any intentional triggering of Godwin's Law in order to invoke its thread-ending effects will be unsuccessful.



To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (78401)3/10/2001 8:55:49 PM
From: Stock Farmer  Respond to of 436258
 
Frankly sir, I thought your response was quite appropriate!

John.