SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RON BL who wrote (131132)3/10/2001 3:28:02 PM
From: greenspirit  Respond to of 769667
 
Well then, let's differentiate and say those Democrats who would get to keep more of their hard earned money can send it in to Bush.

After all, they know the government can't do without a single less penny. Its ok for the American people to have their taxes raised and do without something over and over, but never-oh-never can the government do with less.

After all, there is NO waste in government, no fraud, nothing which isn't pure and noble. Giving your money to the government is tantamount to giving it to your church.

Just consider it a non-itemizable charitable contribution. :)



To: RON BL who wrote (131132)3/10/2001 3:57:46 PM
From: Little Joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Ron:

"but at least 1 of every 2 Democrats has their hands out"

How did you reach that conclusion??

Little joe



To: RON BL who wrote (131132)3/10/2001 5:20:31 PM
From: Mr. Palau  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
>>IF this country were to split in two, we would have the producers on one side and the actors/musicians and the hand out crowd on the other.<<

Ron, at least one of those actors -- Julia Roberts -- would do very well under GW's tax cut, around $9,000 a day.

post-gazette.com