SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: westpacific who wrote (78459)3/10/2001 11:17:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
West, the first Fed cur was unexpected, and thus the explosion justified, the second cut was the best known secret in America (thus, my get out no later than 2:15 PM), the third one is a different story, it is well expected, and wrongfully, craved for by the bulls, but it comes more than 2.5 months after the first change in direction (actually the "stance" change occurred December 19th), thus one would expect that some of the economic impact of the easing should be no more than 1 or 2 Q away, that is about the anticipation period of the market. The surprise might be, that the fed's this time might be pushing a string (at least, that what I think that the talking head are going to discuss by mid -April as the earning reports come in ugly). If you look at the economic numbers, however, we really are not in, and IMTO, not likely to get in, a recession. That means, that the fed's activities were a little too panicky. We'll pay the piper on that next year, when the fed's might be forced to prematurely reign in, what by then might be (perceived as) a recovery.

Short term, however, much more important than the fed rates is the increase in liquidity, the repo's operation are pumping so much money (Late 1999 was a child game relative to the "pumping in the last two months) that some of that money will find it's way to the market. Will the turn be Monday? Wednesday, or delayed further? I don't know for sure, but sooner or later, that liquidity will drive financial assets up.

As for MO (it is in my core, since last Sep at $28, when I also suggested it on "Steve's thread as a long core holding), I think it will see at least $60 before topping, and could even reach a PE of 16 on next year's $4.70 or so earnings. It was undervalued for so long, it will become overvalued. Don't short a stock that keeps making new highs, I would wait until it changes trend.

Zeev



To: westpacific who wrote (78459)3/10/2001 11:22:44 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 436258
 
WP - can I see your short list please.
I would like to balance my longs a bit with short candidates.

Thanks

M