Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TGPTNDR who wrote (134397)	3/11/2001 2:11:49 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1575772

Scott, Give it a rest -- Bush got 25% more votes when & where it counted. tgptndr, You can't always believe what Rush tells you. ted

To: TGPTNDR who wrote (134397)	3/11/2001 8:26:41 PM
From: stribe30	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575772

25% more votes? maybe in texas :) Speaking of drilling.. none of you down there probably noted this since it probably hasnt made a big dent in major newspapers.. but your lumber guys and senators involved with them in those states are threatening to again try to penalize Cdn softwood lumber imports by heavily tariffing them if we dont cut back or remove the supposed subsidy we use for them - never mind that international tribunals have ruled in favour of Canada 3 times the past 20 yrs.. once again proving that the USA supports free trade - except when someone else's products are doing better then theres.. but I digress... There is discussion going on that if the US unilaterally penalizes Canadian lumber imports before a trade body can look at the issue again, Canada should instead of backing off, retaliate by hitting where it hurts.. which among other things would involve hiking dramatically the price of gas and oil that we sell to you.. or turning off the spigot completely... the theory goes that this would be nice counter leverage.. of course..the danger to that is lending credence to the "lets not be controlled by foreign nations energy policies" argument and possibly giving the pro-ANWR opponents some more ammo to use... so I'm undecided on whether that should be followed thru or not. Personally.. I just dont see the ANWR drilling issue passing.. so theres no point in stirring the pot.. even if it means that the uncalled for punitive action against our lumber producers goes unanswered... better to retaliate somewhere else and wait for the WTO to vindicate us (again) and let Max Baucus stew