Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Trading Machine who wrote (2513)	3/11/2001 10:21:48 AM
From: donald sew	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 52237

Trading Machine, >>>> Where the heck is accountability in this system <<<< My issue is really targeted to J6P, who do not have a good understanding of the market and who are easily led by some who are less than ethical. Everyone is responsible for their own calls, but for those who are unethically manipulating the market how much accountability is there in the current system. I heard last week that the NAZ lost about 3+ TRILLION in market cap, and Im sure some of that can be attributed to some level of unethical manipulation. Here's something I have thought of in the past. With every recommendation from a firm, that firm should be required not to sell or buy that stock(depending on bullish or negative recommendation) within a certain period of time whether its a few days or weeks. So if a BUY recommendation is given, then that firm should not be allowed to sell it within a certain period of time. Of course its not that simple, but Im sure some sort of improvement can be made and regulated.