Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JRI who wrote (2540)	3/11/2001 7:48:53 PM
From: Square_Dealings	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52237

My correspondence with R. Hahn, where I got the info. > Richard, > > The data you presented this weekend is indeed alarming. I have commented on > this in several places on the web and its getting a bit of controversy since > many can not believe it. > > Could you please provide a link to the source of your data? Is the total a > composite that you get from the components like broker dealer financing, > interbank reverse RPs, etc. or does the Federal Reserver print the number > you are presenting? > > Another question Im getting is, is there any component of this that could > represent short positions (which have been increasing steadily over the last > several months by commercial speculators as reported in the Commitment of > Traders report). > > Thanks, > Michael Finsterwald Hi Michael, Here's the Federal Reserve Link for the data.... federalreserve.gov I use the second batch of Bank Assets and Liabilities, which are not seasonally adjusted. The specific data is found in the "Security" line item. "Consists of reverse RPs with brokers and dealers and loans to purchase and carry securities." federalreserve.gov You are right about the "margin debt" including margined short positions in addition to long positions. The knife cuts both ways. Regards, Richard