Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Whist who wrote (131315)	3/12/2001 11:08:03 AM
From: willcousa	Respond to of 769667

Because the trigger will reduce spending rather than reduce the tax cuts. If we need a trigger it will be because the economy is deteriorating and tax cuts will be even more necessary.

To: Mr. Whist who wrote (131315)	3/12/2001 12:24:22 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

dear flappy... >>> and even Trench Lott himself -- signed on to the Democratic idea of a trigger for future tax cuts? How will it play in Podunk, talking points. Repubs get tax cut now and get credit. In future the opportunity is to fend off democrat attempts to raise taxes. Very simple tactic of a bird in the hand and leave the dems looking up for the future turd falling into their eye. Best case is Repubs fought for tax cuts (take credit)and they told the dumb dems we told you so. Worst case is Repubs fought for tax cuts (take credit)and they tell American's dem dem want to spend all your money. It's called the Repub win win win and by the way what are all the former dem rapist leaders doing these days. You know those best RAPIST's whoever were. Remeber it's only those with IQ's below 100 who vote democrat. But they have some concious comprehension of increasing taxes. They will also all witness 5, 10 20 100 dollars in each pay check. That's real, that not hot air dem rhetoric. OH PARDON me AIN'T that so RICH. tom watson tosiwmee