Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jerome who wrote (43551)	3/12/2001 12:27:43 PM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 70976

How could you even begin to blame Bush for the nasdaq fall. Shame on you Jerome!

To: Jerome who wrote (43551)	3/12/2001 12:32:12 PM
From: Shoibal Datta	Respond to of 70976

The NASDAQ bottom before the Oct 98 rocket took off was ca. 1450. Not saying we are headed there, but, geez, it isn't that far away either. The pundits seem to have run out of alphabets describing bottoms. I wouldn't be surprised if we start hearing multi-alphabet descriptions (U with a V spike, or L with a W test, for example) or worse still, descriptions of rigidity (soft, firm, bouncy, squishy, etc). I find that ironic - I research viruses for a day job and at the moment the best scientific description I can give of my research is that the virus is surprisingly squishy!