Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Machaon who wrote (131333)	3/12/2001 1:33:50 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Again, a simple point eludes you. Condemning the act means that one assumes that some or all persons could be, under the right circumstances, tempted. Therefore, it means that one does not, in fact, presume 100% heterosexual orientation.........

To: Machaon who wrote (131333)	3/12/2001 1:53:47 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Dear Barry, you go directly to a result and miss the point completely. I know of no religions that are saying that, according to their god, homosexuality is totally by choice and could not be caused by anything sexual or hormonal. Catholism teaches that doing sex outside of the purpose of creating a new human is wrong. I don't know of a way for two same sex homosexuals to do sex together and create a new human. I don't know all the details but I guess the definition of correct sex is a penis depositing semem in a vagina. (And no birth control). Everything else is wrong. Now many have many desires and some are considered sin and some are not. Why there is the desire does not matter a wit. What one does about the desire is what religion doctrine defines. How one acts is what religion is about. Barry you have fabricated a bunch of sophist stupid points that miss the target completely. that's what duuuuhhhhhh mean. I suggest that you are doing the ranting of stupid ideas. Only stupid people express stupid ideas over and over and over again. Of these conclusions I am 100% certain. I suspect that I am correct about the heart of teachings of most major religions. I doubt you know squat about any religion. tom watson tosiwmee