SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (129836)3/12/2001 3:30:10 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Mary,

Engineers may fully understand the minutia of microprocessor technology, but an understanding of markets, market size, and marketing are completely different subject matters.

I predicted on this thread three years ago that Intel's relationship with Rambus was going to be a big disappointment, and I explained exactly why. Is that considered processor minutia in your book of sarcasm?

Intel has been talking up IA-64 for many years now, and have no products to show for it. It might happen, but I don't see that IA-64 has any significant advantage over anybody else. The tool chain alone makes x86 the architecture of choice for the indefinite future.

Scumbria



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (129836)3/12/2001 3:32:41 PM
From: Joseph Pareti  Respond to of 186894
 
>Let's come back 3-4 years from now.

good idea. By then Warren Buffet will still be the richest and most succesful investor of all times, Intel will still be at the forefront of technology, AMD will own a couple of exhibits at the Boston computer museum, and the other Mary (Meeker) will be listed in the Guiness book of jokes (A.K.A the thread of clowns in SI)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News