SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : High Tolerance Plasticity -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Razorbak who wrote (1441)3/12/2001 4:22:58 PM
From: ItsAllCyclical  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23153
 
>> IMO, this market is just as inefficient on the downside as it is has been on the upside, especially in the smaller caps. <<

I disagree. If it were truely inefficient then more people would be far more worried about Nasdaq 1000. It could happen. Fair value for the Nasdaq is probably 1500 or less. 1000 would not be a stretch.

Don't think Greenspan and the PPT would let that happen though (at least not ST).



To: Razorbak who wrote (1441)3/12/2001 6:35:26 PM
From: William JH  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 23153
 
Razorbak, I was attempting a bit of sarcasm when I mentioned the efficiency of the markets. Really, I've never understood how anyone could believe that hypothesis.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News