SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (131386)3/12/2001 5:59:33 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
That is more or less the lines along which I think the problem will be solved, in fact. A pleasure to "reach across the aisle"......



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (131386)3/12/2001 6:17:15 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
What matters is that people could legally form a household with another person and grant that person legal rights in inheritance and medical decisions that have been traditionally associated with marriage.

Nadine, wouldn't it be a whole lot easier and less controversial to just get rid of inheritance taxes and give everybody a check-off on their drivers' licenses for medical decisions whether they're married or not? Why create a whole new category of marriage or household? Seems to me there are easy ways to manage the inequalities. Why make those two widows go through some process to form a household?

Karen



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (131386)3/12/2001 7:09:49 PM
From: Ish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
<<Many gay people, who feel strongly that they have a right to marry, will not be happy with this half-a-loaf of civil union, but I think most people in this county could get used to the idea. Particularly if you trot out some non-controversial examples, such as a pair of childless widows who've been best friends all their life, and want to look after each other in old age. >>

That will require rethinking on some pension plans and Social Security but I can see where it could be done.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (131386)3/12/2001 9:34:27 PM
From: SecularBull  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Nadine, are you feeling alright? I actually agree with you to some extent. Do these people get hammered with "the marriage penalty", too?

~SB~