Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : INTC: Intel Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (3)	3/12/2001 10:38:55 PM
From: Scumbria	Respond to of 47

Dan, Looks like you have given Intel a clean start. Scumbria

To: Dan3 who wrote (3)	3/12/2001 10:44:01 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Respond to of 47

Dan, Now look what you've done!!! :)))

To: Dan3 who wrote (3)	3/12/2001 10:45:50 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 47

This use of the Athlon was, I believe, documented on the Anand website about 9 months ago, I believe. Surprised you missed it.

To: Dan3 who wrote (3)	3/13/2001 10:38:35 AM
From: Tony Viola	Respond to of 47

Dan, >A front end processor maintains the sessions of a multitude of users connected to a server cluster, not doing a lot of work for any particular process (it "forwards" each request to a server in the cluster). It does need to quickly cycle many relatively independent threads. So which layer of the SI server hierarchies is screwed, I wonder? Probably the database. I miss my SI, man, but new start here, huh? Tony

To: Dan3 who wrote (3)	3/13/2001 2:11:05 PM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 47

Dan3, <<<in this increasingly cost conscious market, the price advantage of a dual Athlon system compared to a quad Xeon system must be enormous. If there's any truth to this story, it puts AMD in the enterprise server space, right off the bat. It may also cap Intel's progress into the enterprise space. >>> I don't think any of you engineers understand what is going on. The fight is not between Intel and AMD. The fight is to capture the heart and soul of information technology. The fight is to make RISC systems the next MAC. The fight is to place IBM series 390 computers into a prominent place in a science museum. Intel has to be like the IBM of the 50's, 60's, 70's and 80's. AMD has no chance of doing this by themselves. They don't have the R&D money, resources, and marketing potential. AMD has to ride Intel's coattails and become Avis to Intel's Hertz. If they to go head to head with Intel, as the ego of a Jerry Sanders may be prone to do, that would be a very risky strategy. He would have to bet the copmpany. His chances of success in going head to head with Intel is very small - even if he came up with significantly better products across the board. Right now AMD is nothing but a Me Too Company . If Intel had management that was really up to it, they can convert this economic freefall into a major opportunity. IA can significantly cut hardware costs for companies using information technology to be globally competitive. Mary